Ayodhya Case Judgement: The five-judge bench of the Supreme Court delivered the ‘Ayodhya verdict’ unanimously on 9 November 2019. The summary of the judgement is as follows:-. (i) The Court ordered the Government of India to form a Board of Trustees for the construction of the Ram Mandir temple within three months. Sri Ram Janma Bhumi Ayodhya Judgment Summary as per Supreme Court. Advocatetanmoy November 9, 2019 A five Judges Constitutional Bench has delivered an unanimous Judgment. Bench : The bench, also comprising Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer. Detailed Judgment Shall be followed : Ram Lala Virajman. Ramlala Virajman shall get the entire disputed land [2.77 acre ... On 9 November 2019, the Indian Supreme Court delivered its verdict on a seven-decade long legal battle over a disputed site in the north Indian city of Ayodhya. The 2.77-acre site is believed by Hindus to be the birthplace of Lord Ram and was also where a mosque once stood which was demolished in 1992. The five-judge bench, in a unanimous ruling, handed the disputed land to a trust to build a temple. The Muslim litigants were awarded a separate piece of land for a mosque. This paper examines ... The Indian Supreme Court on Saturday awarded the disputed site on which a mosque was demolished by a Hindutva mob in 1992 in the town of Ayodhya in Uttar Pradesh to the Hindus, paving the way for a... The first place where I read about the Ayodhya dispute in some detail was L. K. Advani‘s autobiography – “My Country My Life“. This blog began as a summary of what he wrote. And then I read some more on Wikipedia and other online articles (linked in the end) and added additional points / perspectives to create this comprehensive timeline. There is a vast difference between the Ayodhya judgement given by the Allahabad High Court in 2010 and the judgement given by the Supreme Court in 2019. After a long period of judicial proceedings, the Supreme Court finally came to a verdict. In contrast to the equal distribution of the disputed land among the three contending parties as per the High Court, the Supreme Court gave the entire disputed land to the Hindus, the Muslims were to be allotted 5 acres of land somewhere else at a ... Justice Bhushan, on behalf of Chief Justice Misra and himself, declared that a three-judge Bench will hear the Ayodhya Title Dispute. Thereby, he rejected referring the matter to a five-judge Constitution Bench. Justice Bhushan held that the Supreme Court need not review its 1994 judgment in Faruqui. The Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgment in the Ayodhya land dispute case that will have far-reaching effects. The five-judge Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi read out a uninanimous judgment and ruled in favour of the Ram Janmabhoomi and said there will be Ram Mandir at the disputed site and Muslims will be given an alternate 5 acre land for their mosque. In a 5-0 unanimous verdict, the Supreme Court has ruled that the 2.77 acres of disputed land in Ayodhya will be handed over to a trust for the construction of a Ram Mandir. The court directed the central government to frame a scheme within three months to allocate land for the mosque and forming the temple trust . The Supreme Court gave its verdict on the Ayodhya case today The disputed land in Ayodhya will be given to a government-run trust for a temple and a "prominent site" in the holy town in Uttar...
[index] [9343] [8668] [5217] [1512] [2966] [2924] [2555] [950] [2585] [2929]
Copyright © 2024 m.playbestrealmoneygame.xyz